
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become a highly beneficial tool for many clinicians, providing real-time bedside imaging that informs and enhances clinical decision-making. While gastric ultrasound remains a well-established use of POCUS for anesthesiologists to assess aspiration risk, the technology’s utility extends beyond the stomach. Non-gastric applications of POCUS—such as cardiac, pulmonary, vascular, and regional anesthesia imaging—offer the anesthesiologist a powerful toolset to optimize perioperative care, respond quickly to dynamic changes, and improve patient safety.
One of the most impactful non-gastric uses of POCUS for the anesthesiologist is in cardiac assessment. Focused cardiac ultrasound enables anesthesiologists to evaluate myocardial function, detect pericardial effusions, identify valvular pathology, and assess volume status with rapid, high-resolution visualization. In the perioperative setting, this proves invaluable in managing hemodynamic instability. Anesthesiologists can detect left ventricular dysfunction or assess for ischemic changes via regional wall motion abnormalities when electrocardiography or invasive monitors are inconclusive. This rapid diagnostic capability allows for timely interventions, particularly in high-risk surgical patients or those undergoing emergency procedures.
Pulmonary ultrasound has also become an important application of POCUS for anesthesiologists, especially in critical care and intraoperative monitoring. Its utility surpasses that of chest radiography for detecting pneumothorax, pleural effusion, atelectasis, and pulmonary edema. The absence of lung sliding is a reliable indicator of pneumothorax, while B-lines and pleural effusions can guide fluid management and ventilatory strategies. Anesthesiologists managing patients with acute respiratory decompensation can use POCUS to quickly distinguish between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema or confirm lung re-expansion after a thoracostomy.
Vascular access is another domain where POCUS has improved the precision and safety of anesthetic practice. Ultrasound guidance significantly increases success rates for central venous catheterization and arterial line placement while reducing complications such as arterial puncture, hematoma, and catheter malposition. Additionally, anesthesiologists can utilize venous compression ultrasound to evaluate for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which is especially valuable in perioperative patients with risk factors for venous thromboembolism. In the intensive care unit and operating room alike, vascular ultrasound enhances procedural confidence and decreases reliance on confirmatory radiographic studies.
In regional anesthesia, POCUS allows for visualization of neural structures, surrounding anatomy, and local anesthetic spread during peripheral nerve blocks. This results in increased accuracy, reduced complications, and improved block efficacy. Compared to landmark-based techniques, ultrasound guidance shortens onset time, lowers the required dose of local anesthetic, and minimizes the risk of intravascular injection or nerve injury. These advantages have made POCUS the gold standard of care for many regional anesthetic procedures, especially in challenging anatomical regions or in patients with altered anatomy.
Despite these advantages, widespread anesthesiologist adoption of non-gastric POCUS has been met with logistical challenges. Barriers such as limited faculty expertise, inconsistent access to ultrasound equipment, and variability in training curricula remain. Many anesthesiology residency programs recognize the importance of POCUS education but lack the infrastructure or standardized curricula to deliver consistent training. To address these gaps, organizations like the American Society of Anesthesiologists have launched certification programs to promote competency-based learning and clinical proficiency in diagnostic POCUS.
In conclusion, non-gastric POCUS applications have transformed the scope of anesthesiology practice, offering dynamic, bedside assessments that support rapid decision-making across perioperative and critical care settings. From hemodynamic assessment and respiratory diagnostics to vascular access and regional anesthesia, the integration of POCUS significantly improves patient care. Continued emphasis on structured training and system-wide implementation will be crucial to realizing the full potential of this versatile imaging modality in anesthetic practice.
References
- Naji A, Chappidi M, Ahmed A, Monga A, Sanders J. Perioperative point-of-care ultrasound use by anesthesiologists. Cureus. 2021;13(9):e18131. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15217.
- Haskins SC, Bronshteyn Y, Perlas A, et al. Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine expert panel recommendations on point-of-care ultrasound education and training for regional anesthesiologists. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46(12):1031-1036. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102561.
- Li L, Yong RJ, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Perioperative point of care ultrasound (POCUS) for anesthesiologists: an overview. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020;24(12):84. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-020-0847-0.
- Kalagara H, Coker B, Gerstein NS, Kukreja P. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for the cardiothoracic anesthesiologist. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36(7):2192-2200. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.01.018.
- Dhir A, Soni N, Bansal S, et al. Point-of-care ultrasound: a vital tool for anesthesiologists in the perioperative and critical care settings. J Clin Anesth. 2024;80:110-117. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66908.